![]() ![]() But ill post a form link here for what TheLordOfWar posted. Pretty sure im late to the party here and that ya'all have done the work or seen the spreadsheet. Let alone test every part in the free mode. I'm not gonna buy every part to upgrade a system to a certain 3D score. But there you see the problem that you need to run the parts. Would love some in-game list made by the dev, not others. ![]() Maybe there will be a list of it in the community Guides ) You can run all parts in the free mode to determine the score of all graphic Cards and CPUs^^ The problem here is, that you need to run the parts, to know their score. S_graphics = 164 x ( 2 / (1/24.66 + 1/19.51) ) = 3573 (rounded) įor the S_cpu formula you also need the FPS from CPU test, for example 17.48. Say they were 24.66 for Test 1 and 19.51 for Test 2. So the Formula is 1 / ( 0.85/S_graphics + 0.15/S_cpu )įor the S_graphics formula you will need the FPS from Test 1 and 2 (you have to run 3DMark for the results). Time Spy Score: Replace W_graphics with 0.85 and W_cpu with 0.15 I was only concerned with the benchmark on the NVMe drive which (predictably) improved by a ton.Ursprünglich geschrieben von DiabloTheKid:Click ingame on the 3DMark technical Guide, go to site 24/128 and find the formula. Anyways if you are on 2B7QCXE7 right now then I wouldn't bother updating unless the new version gives something amazing.ĬPU score is lower probably because I was actively using the computer when I was running it. Might only be getting pushed via Magician 5.2. Supposedly 4B6QCXP7 started rolling out near the end of last month but I don't see it on the website. Secure Erase and reinstall is the recommended "fix". Unless you want to reinstall the OS I'd stay away for now since I'm reading reports of significant slow down after installing. Well actually one of them benched ok but has lower read speeds than the other which didn't give a good bench?.ĮDIT: I found that firmware 3B7QCXE7 came out for the Samsung 960 Evo. The only other anamolies are the NVMe drive (the 860 Evo for me here as well) and the 2 3.5" drives I have connected. This feature sets up for a "dynamic" overclock by having the CPU run at 4.7Ghz on all cores at the same time vs the norm where the cores will individually run at 4.7Ghz when needed and able to. ![]() The results are getting skewed by people running ASUS boards that have Multicore Enhancement turned on (it's default enabled). It says my 8700K is performing way below expectations. My external drive isn't having it so I disconnected the drive for the first pass. Please bench your new builds! The wiki has a great guide for this. I realized I was using the default Microsoft Windows NVMe drivers and instead I installed the Samsung driver that I downloaded from their website. The scores aren't bad by any means, but cmon (I mean why else would you buy these drives). This is something I usually skip because I'm giddy about the new build, but I benchmarked it with the utility afterward and found that the 960 EVO M.2 SSD was "performing below expectations" and it was the only component of my PC that had any issues: I just rebuilt my gaming rig, full part list at.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |